Updated 30 March 2026
Procore vs PlanGrid (Autodesk Build)
Platform versus ecosystem. Procore is a comprehensive construction management platform with project management, financial controls, and quality/safety tools. Autodesk Build (formerly PlanGrid) is deeply integrated with BIM and Autodesk's design tools. The choice depends on whether project management or BIM integration is your primary need.
Pricing Models
Procore
Volume-based pricing. Unlimited users.
$10,000 to $50,000+/year depending on annual construction volume. All users (internal staff, subcontractors, architects) are included at no extra cost.
Autodesk Build
Per-user pricing. Autodesk Construction Cloud.
Approximately $75/user/month ($900/user/year). Deep discounts available for Autodesk enterprise agreements. Bundling with AutoCAD/Revit can reduce per-product cost.
Key Differences
Drawing and BIM Integration
Autodesk Build has the deepest integration with AutoCAD, Revit, and Navisworks. Models and drawings sync natively across the Autodesk Construction Cloud. Design changes in Revit automatically update in Autodesk Build. Procore supports drawing management and can import Autodesk files, but the integration is not native. For BIM-heavy projects (hospitals, airports, complex commercial), Autodesk's ecosystem is superior for drawing/model management.
Financial Management
Procore's financial management module is significantly more comprehensive than Autodesk Build's cost management features. Procore handles budgets, change orders, commitments, invoicing, pay applications, and real-time cost forecasting. For firms where financial controls and owner reporting are critical, Procore is the clear choice.
RFI and Submittal Workflows
Both platforms handle RFIs and submittals well. Procore has a more mature workflow with complex distribution lists, ball-in-court tracking, and multi-party review chains developed over 15+ years. Autodesk Build's RFI management is good and improving but less established. For firms managing 50+ RFIs per project, Procore's workflow depth is advantageous.
Integration Ecosystem
Procore has 500+ third-party integrations covering scheduling (Primavera, Microsoft Project), ERP (Sage, Viewpoint, QuickBooks), and specialty tools. Autodesk Build integrates deeply within the Autodesk ecosystem but has fewer third-party integrations. For firms using non-Autodesk design tools or requiring ERP integration, Procore offers more flexibility.
User Pricing at Scale
For a project with 50 stakeholders: Autodesk Build at $75/user/month costs $45,000/year. Procore at the equivalent volume tier costs $25,000 to $40,000/year with unlimited users. Procore becomes more cost-effective as team size grows. Autodesk Build is more cost-effective for smaller, focused teams of 10 to 15 users.
The Verdict
Choose Procore if:
- + Financial management and owner reporting are priorities
- + You need 50+ users including subs at no extra cost
- + You use a diverse set of design and scheduling tools
- + Quality/safety management is a requirement
Choose Autodesk Build if:
- + BIM is central to your project delivery
- + You already use AutoCAD, Revit, and Navisworks
- + Your team is under 20 users (per-seat pricing is cheaper)
- + Drawing/model management is more important than financials